Bare Metal Compared with Kubernetes
Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:19:26 -0000|
Read Time: 0 minutes
It has been fascinating to watch the tide of application containerization build from stateless cloud native web applications to every type of data-centric workload. These workloads include high performance computing (HPC), machine learning and deep learning (ML/DL), and now most major SQL and NoSQL databases. As an example, I recently read the following Dell Technologies knowledge base article: Bare Metal vs Kubernetes: Distributed Training with TensorFlow.
Bare metal and bare metal server refer to implementations of applications that are directly on the physical hardware without virtualization, containerization, and cloud hosting. Many times, bare metal is compared to virtualization and containerization is used to contrast performance and manageability features. For example, contrasting an application on bare metal to an application running in a container can provide insights into the potential performance differences between the two implementations.
Figure 1: Comparison of bare metal to containers implementations
Containers encapsulate an application with supporting binaries and libraries to run on one shared operating system. The container’s runtime engine or management applications, such as Kubernetes, manage the container. Because of the shared operating system, a container’s infrastructure is lightweight, providing more reason to understand the differences in terms of performance.
In the case of comparing bare metal with Kubernetes, distributed training with TensorFlow performance was measured in terms of throughput. That is, we measured the number of images per second when training CheXNet. Five tests were run in which each test consecutively added more GPUs across the bare metal and Kubernetes systems. The solid data points in Figure 2 show that the tests were run using 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 GPUs.
Figure 2: Running CheXNet training on Kubernetes compared to bare metal
Figure 2 shows that the Kubernetes container configuration was similar in terms of performance to the bare metal configuration through 4 GPUs. The test through 8 GPUs shows an eight percent increase for bare metal compared with Kubernetes. However, the article that I referenced offers factors that might contribute to the delta:
- The bare metal system takes advantage of the full bandwidth and latency of raw InfiniBand while the Kubernetes configuration uses software defined networking using flannel.
- The Kubernetes configuration uses IP over InfiniBand, which can reduce available bandwidth.
Studies like this are useful because they provide performance insight that customers can use. I hope we see more studies that encompass other workloads. For example, a study about Oracle and SQL Server databases in containers compared with running on bare metal would be interesting. The goal would be to understand how a Kubernetes ecosystem can support a broad ecosystem of different workloads.
Hope you like the blog!
Related Blog Posts
Oracle Database Solutions on Docker Container and Kubernetes
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:51:56 -0000|
Read Time: 0 minutes
Containers are a lightweight, stand-alone, executable package of software that includes everything that is needed to run an application: code, runtime, system tools, system libraries, and settings. A container isolates software from its environment and ensures that it works uniformly despite any differences between development and staging. Containers share the machine’s operating system kernel and do not require an operating system for each application, driving higher server efficiencies and reducing server and licensing costs.
The traditional build process for database application development is complex, time intensive and difficult to schedule. With containers and the right supporting tools, the traditional build process is transformed into a self-service, on-demand experience that enables developers to rapidly deploy applications. In the remaining sections of this article we describe how to develop the capability to have an Oracle database container running in a matter of minutes.
Oracle has a long commitment to supporting the developer communities working in containerized environments. At the DockerCon US event in April 2017, Oracle announced that its Oracle 12c database software application would be available alongside of other Oracle products on Docker Store, the standard for dev-ops developers. Dev-ops developers have pulled over four billion images from the Docker Store and are increasingly turning to the Docker Store as the canonical source for high-quality curated content. In the present-day database world, customers are invariably switching to the use of containers with Kubernetes management to build and run a wide variety of applications and services in a highly available on-premises hosted environment.
Containerized environments can reliably offer high-performance compute, storage and network capabilities with the necessary configurations. A containerized environment also reduces overhead costs by providing a repeatable process for application deployment across build, test, and production systems. To enable the deployment and management of containerized applications, organizations use Kubernetes technologies to operate at any scale including production. Kubernetes enables powerful collaboration and workflow management capabilities by deploying containers for cloud-native, distributed applications and microservices. It even allows you to repackage legacy applications for increased portability, more efficient deployment, and improved customer and employee engagement.
Figure 1: Docker containers for reducing development complexity
For many companies, to boost productivity and time to value, container usage starts with the departments that are focused on software development. Their journey typically starts with installing, implementing, and using containers for applications that are based on the microservice architecture as shown in Figure 2. Developers want to be able to build microservices-based container applications without changing code or infrastructure.
This approach enables portability between data centers and obviates the need for changes in traditional applications enabling faster development and deployment cycles. Oracle Docker containers run the microservices while Kubernetes is used for container orchestration. Also, the microservices running within Docker containers can communicate with the Oracle databases by using messaging services.
Figure 2: Architecture for Oracle Database featuring Docker and Kubernetes
Using orchestration and automation for containerized applications, developers can self-provision an Oracle database, thereby increasing flexibility and productivity while saving substantial time in creating a production copy for development and testing environments. This solution enables development teams to quickly provision isolated applications without the traditional complexities.
Our Dell EMC engineers recently tested and validated a solution for Oracle database using Docker containers and Kubernetes. The solution uses Oracle Database in containers, Kubernetes, and the Container Storage Interface (CSI) Driver for Dell EMC PowerFlex OS to show how dev/ops teams can transform their development processes.
Dell EMC engineers demonstrated two use cases for this solution. Both of our use cases feature four Dell EMC PowerEdge R640 servers, which are an integral part of Dell EMC VxFlex Ready Nodes, and a CSI Driver for Dell EMC PowerFlex that were hosted in our DellEMC labs.
Use Case 1
In use case 1, the DellEMC engineers manually provisioned the container-based development and testing environment shown in Figure 3 as follows:
- Install Docker.
- Activate the Docker Enterprise Edition-License.
- Run the Oracle 12c database within the Docker container.
- Build and run the Oracle 19c database in the Docker container.
- Import the sample Oracle schemas that are pulled from GitHub into the Oracle 12c and 19c database.
- Install Oracle SQL Developer and query tables from the container to demonstrate that the connection from Oracle SQL Developer to Oracle database functions.
Figure 3: Use Case 1 - Architecture
The key benefit of our first use case was the time that we saved by using Docker containers instead of the traditional manual installation and configuration method of building a typical Oracle database environment. Use Case 1 planning also demonstrated the importance of selecting the Docker registry location and storage provisioning options that are most appropriate for the requirements of a typical development and testing environment.
Use Case 2
Use Case 2 demonstrates the value of CSI plug-in integration with Kubernetes and Dell EMC Power Flex storage to automate storage configuration. Kubernetes orchestration with PowerFlex provides a container deployment strategy with persistent storage. It demonstrates the ease, simplicity, and speed in scaling out a development and testing environment from production Oracle databases. In this use case, a developer provisions the Oracle database in containers on the same infrastructure described in Use Case 1 only this time using Kubernetes with the CSI Driver for Dell EMC PowerFlex. Figure 4 depicts the detailed architecture of Use Case 2.
Figure 4. Use Case 2 – Architecture
Use Case 2 demonstrates how Docker, Kubernetes, and the CSI Driver for Dell EMC PowerFlex accelerate the development life cycle for Oracle applications. Kubernetes configured with the CSI Driver for Dell EMC VxFlex OS simplified and automated the provisioning and removal of containers with persistent storage. Engineers used yaml configuration files along with the kubectl command to quickly deploy and delete containers and complete pods. Our solution demonstrates that developers can provision Oracle databases in containers without the complexities that are associated with installing the database and provisioning storage.
Use Case Observations and Benefits
Adding Kubernetes container orchestration is an essential addition for database developers on a containerized development journey. Automation becomes essential with the expansion of containerized application deployments. In this case, it enabled our developers to bypass the complexities that are associated with plain scripting. Instead, our solution uses open source Kubernetes to accomplish the developer’s objectives. The CSI plug-in integrates with Kubernetes and exposes the capabilities of the Dell EMC PowerFlex storage system, enabling the developer to:
- Take a snapshot of the Oracle database, including the sample schema that was pulled from the GitHub site.
- Protect the work of the existing Oracle database, which was changed before taking the snapshot. We can protect any state. Use the CSI plug-in Driver for Dell EMC PowerFlex OS to create a snapshot that is installed in Kubernetes to provide persistent storage.
- Restore an Oracle 19c database to its pre-deletion state using a snapshot, even after removing the containers and the attached storage.
In our second use case, using Kubernetes combined with the CSI Driver for DellEMC PowerFlex OS simplified and automated the provisioning and removal of containers and storage. In this use case, we used yaml files along with the kubectl command to deploy and delete the containers and pods. All these components facilitate the automation of the container hosting the Oracle database on the top of PowerFlex.
Kubernetes, enhanced with the CSI Driver for Dell EMC VxFlex OS, provides the capability to attach and manage Dell EMC VxFlex OS storage system volumes to containerized applications. Our developers worked with a familiar Kubernetes interface to modify a copy of Oracle database schema gathered from the Github repository database and connect it to the Oracle database container. After modifying the database, the developer protected all progress by using the snapshot feature of Dell EMC VxFlex OS storage system and creating a point-in-time copy of the database.
Comparing Use Case 1 to Use Case 2 demonstrated how we can easily shift away from the complexities of scripting and using the command line to implement a self-service model that accelerates container management. The move to a self-service model, which increases developer productivity by removing bottlenecks, becomes increasingly important as the Docker container environment grows.
The power of containers and automation show how tasks that traditionally required multiple roles—developers and others working with the storage and database administrators - can be simplified. Kubernetes with the CSI plug-in enables developers and others to do more in less time and with fewer complexities. The time savings means that coding projects can be completed faster, benefiting both the developers and the business-side employees and customers. Overall, the key benefit shown in comparing our two use cases was the transformation from a manually managed container environment to an orchestrated system with more capabilities.
Innovation drives transformation. In the case of Docker containers and Kubernetes, the key benefit is a shift to rapid application deployment services. Oracle and many others have embraced containers and provide images of applications, such as for the Oracle 12c database, that can be deployed in days and instantiated in seconds. Installations and other repetitive tasks are replaced with packaged applications that enable the developer to work quickly in the database. The ease of using Docker and Kubernetes, combined with rapid provisioning of persistent storage, transforms development by removing wait time and enabling the developer to move closer to the speed of thought.
The addition of the Kubernetes orchestration system and the CSI Driver for Dell EMC VxFlex OS brings a rich user interface that simplifies provisioning containers and persistent storage. In our testing, we found that Kubernetes plus the CSI Driver for Dell EMC VxFlex OS enabled developers to provision containerized applications with persistent storage. This solution features point-and-click simplicity and frees valuable time so that the storage administrator can focus on business-critical tasks.
Announcing VMware Cloud Foundation 4.0.1 on Dell EMC VxRail 7.0
Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:38:33 -0000|
Read Time: 0 minutes
The latest Dell Technologies Cloud Platform release introduces new support for vSphere with Kubernetes for entry cloud deployments and more
Dell Technologies and VMware are happy to announce the general availability VCF 4.0.1 on VxRail 7.0.
This release offers several enhancements including vSphere with Kubernetes support for entry cloud deployments, enhanced bring up features for more extensibility and accelerated deployments, increased network configuration options, and more efficient LCM capabilities for NSX-T components. Below is the full listing of features that can be found in this release:
- Kubernetes in the management domain: vSphere with Kubernetes is now supported in the management domain. With VMware Cloud Foundation Workload Management, you can deploy vSphere with Kubernetes on the management domain default cluster starting with only four VxRail nodes. This means that DTCP entry cloud deployments can take advantage of running Kubernetes containerized workloads alongside general purpose VM workloads on a common infrastructure!
- Multi-/multi- during VCF bring-up: The Cloud Builder deployment parameter workbook now provides five vSphere Distributed Switch () profiles that allow you to perform bring-up of hosts with two, four, or six physical NICs () and to create up to two vSphere Distributed Switches for isolating system (Management, , ) traffic from overlay (Host, Edge, and Uplinks) traffic.
- Multi-/multi- API support: The VCF API now supports configuring a second vSphere Distributed Switch () using up to four physical NICs (), providing more flexibility to support high performance use cases and physical traffic separation.
- NSX-T cluster-level upgrade support: Users can upgrade specific host clusters within a workload domain so that the upgrade can fit into their maintenance windows bringing about more efficient upgrades.
- Cloud Builder API support for bring-up operations – VCF on VxRail deployment workflows have been enhanced to support using a new Cloud Builder API for bring-up operations. VCF software installation on VxRail during VCF bring-up can now be done using either an API or GUI providing even more platform extensibility capabilities.
- Automated externalization of the vCenter Server for the management domain: Externalizing the vCenter Server that gets created during the VxRail first run (the one used for the management domain) is now automated as part of the bring-up process. This enhanced integration between the VCF Cloud Builder bring-up automation workflow and VxRail API helps to further accelerate installation times for VCF on VxRail deployments.
- BOM Updates: Updated VCF software Bill of Materials with new product versions.
Twitter - @vwhippersnapper