So, it has been all about data—data at rest, data in-flight, IoT data, and so forth. Let’s touch base on the traditional data processing approaches and look at their synergy with modern database technologies. Users’ model-based inquiries manifest to a data entity that is created upon initiation of the request payloads. Traditional database and business applications have been the lone actors that collaborated to provide implementations of such data models. They interact in processing of the users’ inquiries and persisting the results in static data stores for further updates. The business continuity is measured by a degree of such activities among business applications consuming data from these shared data stores. Of course, with a lower degree of such activities, there exists a high potential for the business to be at idle states of operations caused by waiting for more data acquisitions.

The above paradigm is inherently set to potentially miss a great opportunity to maintain a higher degree of business continuity. To fill these gaps, a shift in the static data store paradigm is necessary. The new massive ingested data processing requirements mandate the implementation of processing models that continuously generate insight from any “data in-flight,” mostly in real time. To overcome storage access performance bottlenecks, persisting the interim computed results in a permanent data store is expected to be kept at a minimal level. 

This blog addresses these modern data processing models from a real-time streaming ingestion and processing perspective. In addition, it discusses Dell Technologies’ offerings of such models in detail.

Customers have an option of building their own solutions based on the open source projects for adopting real-time streaming analytics technologies. The mix and match of such components to implement real-time data ingestion and processing infrastructures is cumbersome. It requires a variety of costly skills to stabilize such infrastructures in production environments. Dell Technologies offers validated reference architectures to meet target KPIs on storage and compute capacities to simplify these implementations. The following sections provide high-level information about real-time data streaming and popular platforms to implement these solutions. This blog focuses particularly on two Ready Architecture solutions from Dell—Streaming Data Platform (formerly known as Nautilus) and a Real-Time Streaming reference architecture based on Confluent’s Kafka ingestion platform—and provides a comparative analysis of the platforms.

Real-time data streaming

The topic of real-time data streaming goes far beyond ingesting data in real time. Many publications clearly describe the compelling objectives behind a system that ingests millions of data events in real time. An article from Jay Kreps, one of the co-creators of open source Apache Kafka, provides a comprehensive and in-depth overview of ingesting real-time streaming data. This blog focuses on both ingestion and the processing side of the real-time streaming analytics platforms.

Real-time streaming analytics platforms

A comprehensive end-to-end big data analytics platform demands must-have features that:

• Simplify the data ingestion layer 
• Integrate seamlessly with other components in the big data ecosystem
• Provide programming model APIs for developing insight-analytics applications 
• Provide plug-and-play hooks to expose the processed data to visualization and business intelligence layers

Over the past many years, demand for real-time ingestion features have created motivations for implementing several streaming analytics engines, each with a unique targeted architecture. Streaming analytics engines provide capabilities ranging from micro-batching the streamed data during processing to a near-real-time performance to a true-real-time processing behavior. The ingested datatype may range from a byte-stream event to a complex event format. Examples of such data size ingestion engines are Dell Technologies supported Pravega and open source Apache 2.0 Kafka that can be seamlessly integrated with open source big data analytics engines such as Samza, Spark, Flink, and Storm, to name a few. Proprietary implementations of similar technologies are offered by a variety of vendors. A short list of these products includes Striim, WSO2 Complex Event processor, IBM Streams, SAP Event Stream Processor, and TIBCO Event Processing. 

Real-time streaming analytics solutions: A Dell Technologies strategy

Dell Technologies offer customers two solutions to implement their real-time streaming infrastructure. One solution is built on Apache Kafka as the ingestion layer and Kafka Stream Processing as the default streaming data processing engine. The second solution is built on open source Pravega as the ingestion layer and Flink as the default real-time streaming data processing engine. But how are these solutions being used in response to customers’ requirements? Let’s review possible integration patterns where Dell Technologies real-time streaming offerings facilitate data ingestion and partial preprocessing layers for implementing these patterns.

Real-time streaming and big data processing patterns

Customers implement real-time streaming in different ways to meet their specific requirements. This implies that there may exist many ways of integrating a real-time streaming solution, with the remaining components in the customer’s infrastructure ecosystem. Figure 1 depicts a minimal big data integration pattern that customers may implement by mixing and matching a variety of existing streaming, storage, compute, and business analytics technologies.  

Figure 1: A modern big data integration pattern for processing real-time ingested data

There are several options to implement the Stream Processors layer, including the following two offerings from Dell Technologies.

Dell EMC–Confluent Ready Architecture for Real-Time Data Streaming

The core component of this solution is Apache Kafka, which also delivers Kafka Stream Processing in the same package. Confluent provides and supports the Apache Kafka distribution along with Confluent Enterprise-Ready Platform with advanced capabilities to improve Kafka. Additional community and commercial platform features enable:

• Accelerated application development and connectivity 
• Event transformations through stream processing 
• Simplified enterprise operations at scale and adherence to stringent architectural requirements

Dell Technologies provides infrastructure for implementing stream processing deployment architectures using one of two Kafka distributions from Confluent—Standard Cluster Architecture or Large Cluster Architecture. Both cluster architectures may be implemented as either the streaming branch of a Lambda Architecture or as the single process flow engine in a Kappa Architecture. For a description of the difference between the two architectures, see this blog. For more details about the product, see Dell Real-Time Big Data Streaming Ready Architecture documentation. 

• Standard Cluster Architecture: This architecture consists of two Dell EMC PowerEdge R640 servers to provide resources for Confluent’s Control Center, three R640 servers to host Kafka Brokers, and two R640 servers to provide compute and storage resources for Confluent’s higher-level KSQL APIs leveraging the Apache Kafka Stream Processing engine. The Kafka Broker nodes also host the Kafka Zookeeper and the Kafka Rebalancer applications. Figure 2 depicts the Standard Cluster Architecture.

      Figure 2: Standard Dell Real-Time Streaming Big Data Cluster Architecture

• Large Cluster Architecture: This architecture consists of two PowerEdge R640 servers to provide resources for Confluent’s Control Center, a configurable number of R640 servers for scalability to host Kafka Brokers, and a configurable number of R640 servers to provide compute and storage resources for Confluent’s KSQL APIs to the implementation of the Apache Kafka Stream Processing engine. The Kafka Broker nodes also host the Kafka Zookeeper and the Kafka Rebalancer applications. Figure 3 depicts the Standard Cluster Architecture.

Figure 3: Large Scalable Dell Real-Time Streaming Big Data Cluster Architecture

Dell EMC Streaming Data Platform (SDP)

SDP is an elastically scalable platform for ingesting, storing, and analyzing continuously streaming data in real time. The platform can concurrently process both real-time and collected historical data in the same application. The core components of SDP are open source Pravega for ingestion, Long Term Storage, Apache Flink for compute, open source Kubernetes, and a Dell Technologies proprietary software known as Management Platform. Figure 4 shows the SDP architecture and its software stack components.

Figure 4: Streaming Data Platform Architecture Overview

• Open source Pravega provides the ingestion and storage artifacts by implementing streams built from heterogeneous datatypes and storing them as appended “segments.” The classes of Unstructured, Structured, and Semi-Structured data may range from a small number of bytes emitted by IoT devices, to clickstreams generated from the users while they surf websites, to business applications’ intermediate transaction results, to virtually any size complex events. Briefly, SDP offers two options for Pravega’s persistent Long Term Storage: Dell EMC Isilon and Dell EMC ECS S3. These storage options are mutually exclusive—that is, both cannot be used in the same SDP instance. Currently, upgrading from one to another is yet to be supported. For details on Pravega and its role in providing storage for SDP streams using Isilon or ECS S3, refer to this Pravega webinar. 
• Apache Flink is SDP’s default event processing engine. It consumes ingested streamed data from Pravega’s storage layer and processes it in an instance of a previously implemented data pipeline application. The pipeline application invokes Flink DataStream APIs and processes continuous unbounded streams of data in real time. Alternatives to Flink analytics engines, such as Apache Spark, are also available. To unify multiple analytics engines’ APIs and to prevent writing multiple versions of the same data pipeline application, an attempt is underway to add Apache Beam APIs to SDP to allow the implementation of one Flink data pipeline application that can run on multiple underlying engines on demand. 

Comparative analysis: Dell EMC real-time streaming solutions

Both Dell EMC real-time streaming solutions address the same problem and ultimately provide the same solution for it. However, in addition to using different technology implementations, each tends to be a better fit for certain streaming workloads. The best starting point for selecting one over the other is with an understanding of the exactions of the target use case and workload. 

In most situations, users know what they want for a real-time ingestion solution—typically  an open-source solution that is popular in the industry. Kafka is demanded by customers in most of these situations. Additional characteristics, such as the mechanisms for receiving and storing events and for processing, are secondary. Most of our customer conversations are about a reliable ingestion layer that can guarantee delivery of the customer’s business events to the consuming applications. Further detailed expectations are focused on no loss of events, simple yet long-term storage capacity, and, in most cases, a well-defined process integration method for implementing their initial preprocessing tasks such as filtering, cleansing, and any transformation-like Extract Transform Load (ETL). The purpose of preprocessing is to offload nonbusiness-logic-related work from the target analytics engine—i.e., Spark, Flink, Kafka Stream Processing—resulting in better overall end-to-end real-time performance.

Kafka and Pravega in a nutshell

Kafka is essentially a messaging vehicle to decouple the sender of the event from the application that processes it for gaining business insight. By default, Kafka uses the local disk for temporarily persisting the incoming data. However, the longer-term storage for the ingested data is implemented in what’s known as Kafka Broker Servers. When an event is received, it is broadcast to the interested applications known as subscribers. An application may subscribe to more than one event-type-group, also known as a topic. By default, Kafka stores and replicates events of a topic in partitions configured in Kafka Brokers. The replicas of an event may be distributed among several Brokers to prevent data loss and guarantee recovery in case of a failover. A Broker cluster may be constructed and configured on several Dell EMC PowerEdge R640 servers. To avoid Brokers’ storage and compute capacity limitations, the Brokers’ cluster may be extended through the addition of more Brokers to the cluster topology. This is a horizontally scalable characteristic of Kafka architecture. By design, the de facto analytics engine provided in an open source Kafka stack is known as Kafka Stream Processing. It is customary to use Kafka Stream Processing as a preprocessing engine and then route the results as real-time streaming artifacts to an actual business logic implementing analytics engine such as Flink or Spark Streaming. Confluent wraps the Kafka Stream Processing implementation in an abstract process layer known as KSQL APIs. It makes it extremely simple to run SQL like statements to process events in the core Kafka Stream Processing engine instead of complex third-generation languages such as Java or C++, or scripting languages such as Python.

Unlike Kafka’s messaging protocol and events persisting partitions, Pravega implements a storage protocol and starts to temporarily persist events as appended streams. As time goes by, and the events age, they become long-term data entities. Therefore, unlike Kafka, the Pravega architecture does not require separate long-term storage. Eventually, the historical data is available in the same storage. Pravega, in Dell’s current SDP architecture, routes previously appended streams to Flink, which provides a data pipeline to implement the actual business logic. When it comes to scalability, Pravega uses Isilon or ECS S3 as extended and/or archiving storage.

Although both SDP and Kafka act as a vehicle between the event sender and the event processor, they implement this transport differently. By design, Kafka implements the pub/sub pattern. It basically broadcasts the event to all interested applications at the same time. Pravega makes specific events available directly to a specific application by implementing a point-to-point pattern. Both Kafka and Pravega claim guaranteed delivery. However, the point-to-point approach supports a more rigid underlying transport. 

Conclusion

Dell Technologies offers two real-time streaming solutions, and it is not a simple task to promote one over the other. Ideally, every customer problem requires an initial analysis on the data source, data format, data size, expected data ingestion frequency, guaranteed delivery requirements, integration requirements, transactional rollback requirements (if applicable), storage requirements, transformation requirements, and data structural complexity. Aggregated results from such analysis may help us suggest a specific solution. 

Dell works with customers to collect as much detailed information as possible about the customer’s streaming use cases. Kafka Stream Processing has an impressive feature that offloads the transformation portion of the analytics of a pipeline engine such as Flink or Spark to its Kafka Stream Processing engine. This could be a great advantage. Meanwhile SDP requires extra scripting efforts outside of the Flink configuration space to provide the same logically equivalent capability. On the other hand, SDP simplifies storage complexities through Pravega native streams-per-segments architecture, while Kafka core storage logic pertains to a messaging layer that requires a dedicated file system. Customers that have IoT device data use cases are concerned with ingestion high frequency rate (number of events per second). Soon, we can use this parameter and provide some benchmarking results of a comparative analysis of ingestion frequency rate performed on our SDP and Confluent Real-Time Streaming solutions.

Acknowledgments

I owe an enormous debt of gratitude to my colleagues Mike Pittaro and Mike King of Dell Technologies. They shared their valuable time to discuss the nuances of the text, guided me to clarify concepts, and made specific recommendations to deliver cohesive content.

Author: Amir Bahmanyari, Advisory Engineer, Dell Technologies Data-Centric Workload & Solutions. Amir joined Dell Technologies Big Data Analytics team in late 2017. He works with Dell Technologies customers to build their Big Data solutions. Amir has a special interest in the field of Artificial Intelligence. He has been active in Artificial and Evolutionary Intelligence work since late 1980’s when he was a Ph.D. candidate student at Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. Amir implemented multiple AI/Computer Vision related solutions for Motion Detection & Analysis. His special interest in biological and evolutionary intelligence algorithms lead to innovate a neuron model that mimics the data processing behavior in protein structures of Cytoskeletal fibers. Prior to Dell, Amir worked for several startups in the Silicon Valley and as a Big Data Analytics Platform Architect at Walmart Stores, Inc.

Well-managed companies are always looking for new ways to increase efficiency and reduce costs while maintaining excellence in the quality of their products and services. Hence, IT departments and service providers look at the cloud and APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) as the enablers for automation, driving efficiency, consistency, and cost-savings.

This blog will help you get started with VxRail API by grouping in one place the most useful VxRail API resources available from various public sources. This list of resources will be updated every few months with new material, so consider bookmarking it for your reference as a useful map to help you navigate this topic.

Before jumping into the list, I think it's essential to answer some of the most obvious questions:

What is VxRail API?

VxRail API is a feature of VxRail HCI System Software that exposes management functions with a RESTful application programming interface. It’s designed for ease of use by VxRail customers and ecosystem partners who would like to better integrate third party products with VxRail systems. VxRail API is:

• Simple to use – Thanks to Swagger and PowerShell integration, you can consume the API very easily using a supported web browser or from a familiar command-line interface for Windows and VMware vSphere admins.
• Powerful – VxRail offers dozens of API calls for essential operations such as automated lifecycle management (LCM), and its capabilities are growing with every new release.
• Extensible – This API is designed to complement REST APIs from VMware (such as vSphere Automation API, PowerCLI, VMware Cloud Foundation on Dell EMC VxRail API), offering a familiar look and feel and vast capabilities.

 Why is it relevant?

VxRail API enables you to leverage the full power of automation and orchestration services across your data center. This extensibility enables you to build and operate infrastructure with cloud-like scale and agility. It also streamlines the integration of the infrastructure into your IT environment and processes. Instead of manually managing your environment through the graphical user interface, repeatable operations can be triggered and executed programmatically by software.

More and more customers are embracing DevOps and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) models as they need reliable and repeatable processes to configure the underlying infrastructure resources required for applications. IaC leverages APIs to store configurations in code, making operations repeatable and greatly reducing errors.

 How can I start? Where can I find more information?

To help you navigate through all the resources available, I've grouped them by their level of technical difficulty, starting with 101 (the simplest, explaining the basics, use cases, and value proposition), through 201, up to 301 (the most in-depth technical level).

 101 level

• Solution Brief: Dell EMC VxRail API – Solution Brief – this is a very concise (three page) brochure that briefly explains on a high-level what VxRail API is, the typical use cases, and where you can find additional resources for a quick start. I would highly recommend starting your exploration from this resource.
   
• Infographic: Dell EMC VxRail HCI System Software RESTful API – one of the infographics that brings together quick facts about VxRail HCI System Software differentiation, this specific one explains the value of VxRail API.
  
  
• Blog Post: Take VxRail automation to the next level by leveraging APIs – this is my first blog post focused on VxRail API. It touches on some of the challenges related to managing a farm of VxRail clusters and how VxRail API can fit as a solution. It also covers the enhancements introduced in VxRail HCI System Software 4.7.300, such as Swagger and PowerShell integration.
   
• Blog Post: Protecting VxRail from Power Disturbances – my second API-related blog post, where I explain an exciting use case by Eaton, our ecosystem partner, and the first UPS vendor who integrated their power management solution with VxRail using VxRail API.
   
• Demo: VxRail API – Overview – this is our first VxRail API demo published on the official Dell EMC YouTube channel. It was recorded using VxRail HCI System Software 4.7.300, explains VxRail API basics, API enhancements introduced in this version, and how you can explore the API using Swagger UI.
   
• Demo: VxRail API – PowerShell Package – a continuation of the API overview demo referenced above, focused on PowerShell integration. It was recorded using VxRail HCI System Software 4.7.300.

201 level

• Interactive Demo: VxRail 7.0 – this updated VxRail 7.0 Interactive Demo contains a dedicated section “VxRail 7.0 API” focused on the API. It includes three modules:
  
  
  1. Getting Started – explains how you can interact with Swagger-based documentation and the Developer Center available from vCenter with a couple of practical examples, such as getting information about the VxRail cluster, collecting inventory, exporting a log bundle, and creating a VM from a template. 
  2. Day 1 – Bring Up – explains the API-driven deployment of the VxRail cluster using PowerShell. Note that when using the Day 1 API for the VxRail cluster deployment, Professional Services are still required at this time to provide the best customer experience. 
  3. Day 2 – Operations and Extensibility – discusses some of the "day 2" operations and extensibility with API cookbook examples, the VxRail PowerShell Modules package, VMware PowerCLI, and Ansible.

 The VxRail 7.0 Interactive Demo is a very recent asset prepared by our team for the Dell Technologies World 2020 virtual conference. I would highly recommend it. It was recorded with VxRail HCI System Software version 7.0.010, which introduced Day 1 API for VxRail cluster deployment.

• Manual: Dell EMC VxRail RESTful API Cookbook – this is a handy resource for anyone who would like to jumpstart their VxRail API journey by using code samples documented and tested by our Engineering team for three automation frameworks: CURL for shell/CLI available for various operating systems, PowerShell, and Ansible. Dell Technologies Support portal access is required.
• vBrownBag session: vSphere and VxRail REST API: Get Started in an Easy Way – this is a recent vBrownBag community session that took place at a VMworld 2020 TechTalks Live event - no slides, no “marketing fluff”, but an extensive demo showing the following: 
  1. how you can begin your API journey by leveraging interactive, web-based API documentation
  2. how you can use these APIs from different frameworks (such as scripting with PowerShell in Windows environments) and configuration management tools (such as Ansible on Linux)
  3. how you can consume these APIs virtually from ANY application in ANY programming language.

This very recent asset was prepared at the VMworld 2020 virtual conference, and recorded with VxRail HCI System Software version 7.0.0. 

301 level

• Manual: Dell EMC VxRail Appliance – API User Guide – this is an official reference manual for VxRail API. It provides a detailed description of each available API function, support information for specific VxRail HCI System Software versions, request parameters and possible response codes, successful call response data models, and example values returned. Dell Technologies Support portal access is required.
   
• PowerShell Package: VxRail API PowerShell Modules – a package with VxRail.API PowerShell Modules which allow simplified access to the VxRail API, using dedicated PowerShell commands and built-in help. This version supports VxRail HCI System Software 7.0.010 or higher. Dell Technologies Support portal access is required.
  
  
• API Reference: vSphere Automation API – an official vSphere REST API Reference that provides API documentation, request/response samples, and usage descriptions of the vSphere services.
  
  
• API Reference: VMware Cloud Foundation on Dell EMC VxRail API Reference Guide – an official VCF on VxRail REST API Reference that provides API documentation, request/response samples, and usage descriptions of the VCF on VxRail services.
  
  
• Blog Post: Deployment of Workload Domains on VMware Cloud Foundation 4.0 on Dell EMC VxRail using Public API – this is a blog post from VMware explaining how you can deploy a workload domain on VCF on VxRail using the API with the CURL shell command.

I hope you’ve found this list useful. If that’s the case, don’t forget to bookmark this blog post for your reference. I’m going to update it over time to include the latest collateral.

Enjoy your Infrastructure as Code journey with VxRail API! 

Author: Karol Boguniewicz, Senior Principal Engineer, VxRail Technical Marketing 

Twitter: @cl0udguide