Testing of performance and VDI user density of PowerEdge R750 vs. PowerEdge R760 with Intel Xeon Platinum CPUs
Download PDFFri, 20 Oct 2023 11:06:47 -0000
|Read Time: 0 minutes
Summary
The new Dell PowerEdge R760 with 4th Generation Intel® Xeon® processors offers customers the increased scalability and performance necessary to improve operation of their virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI). The testing highlighted in this document was conducted in Dell Labs by Intel Engineers in December 2022 to provide customers with insights on the capabilities of these new systems and to quantify the value that the systems can provide in a VDI environment. Performance was measured on a previous-generation Dell PowerEdge R750 system and then compared to the results measured on the new Dell PowerEdge R760. Each cluster was configured with four identically configured systems. In this test, the R750 server used the 40-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 CPU, while the R760 used the 44-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8458P CPU. There is a correlation between cores and memory, which drove the R760 configuration to use 2 TB of RAM compared to the 1.5 TB of RAM used in the R750.
Login VSI VDI test tool
Login VSI by Login Consultants is the industry-standard tool for testing VDI environments and server-based computing (RDSH environments). It installs a standard collection of desktop application software (for example, Microsoft Office, Adobe Acrobat Reader) on each VDI desktop; it then uses launcher systems to connect a specified number of users to available desktops within the environment. Once a user is connected, a login script configures the user environment and starts the test script and workload. Each launcher system can launch connections to several ”target” machines (VDI desktops).
For Login VSI, the launchers and Login VSI environment are configured and managed by a centralized management console. Additionally, the following login and boot paradigm was used:
- Users were logged in within a login timeframe of 1 hour.
- All desktops were booted before logins were commenced.
- Data collection interval used was 1 minute.
Test configuration
The following table describes the hardware and software components of the infrastructure used for performance analysis and characterization test:
Table 1. Hardware and software components
Component | Compute host hardware and software | |
Server | PowerEdge R750 | PowerEdge R760 |
CPU | 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 CPU @ 2.30 GHz, 40-core processors | 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8458P @ 2.7 GHz, 44‑core processors |
Memory | 1,024 GB memory @ 3,200 MT/s (16 x 32 GB + 16 x 64 GB DDR4) | 2,048 TB memory @ 4,800 MT/s1 (16 x 128 GB DDR5) |
Network card | Intel E810-CQDA2 (2 x 100 Gbps) | Intel E810-CQDA2 (2 x 100 Gbps) |
Storage | VMware vSAN 8.0 (with OSA architecture) 2 x P5800X 400 GB (caching tier) and 6 x P5510 3.2 TB (capacity tier) | VMware vSAN 8.0 (with OSA architecture) 2 x P5800X 400 GB (caching tier) and 6 x P5510 3.2 TB (capacity tier) |
Network switch | S5248-ON Switch | |
Broker agent | VMware Horizon 8.7 | |
Hypervisor | vSphere ESXi 8.0.0 | |
Desktop operating system | Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise 64-Bit, 22h2 version | |
Office | Office 365 | |
Profile management | FSLogix | |
Login VSI | Login VSI 4.1.40.1 | |
Anti-virus | Windows Defender | |
1 The memory used was rated at 4,800 MT/s when deployed with one DIMM per channel but will operate at 4,400 MT/s when configured with two DIMMs per channel. |
Profiles and workloads
For the purposes of this test, the following workload and profiles were used:
Table 2. Workload and profiles
Workload | VM profiles | ||||
vCPUs | RAM | RAM reserved | Desktop video resolution | Operating system | |
Knowledge Worker
| 2 | 4 GB | 2 GB | 1920 x 1080 | Windows 10 Enterprise 64-bit |
Dell PowerEdge R750 and Dell PowerEdge R760 comparison results
The following table summarizes the test results:
Table 3. Test results
Workload | Density per host |
PowerEdge R750 | 307 |
PowerEdge R760 | 358 |
Conclusion
In our testing, the R760 delivered over 16.6 percent more VDI users (358 compared with 307) while performing at the same average CPU utilization level.